Or in the worst, on written test there will always a probability for student to cheat and copy the other’s answer, which they have noĬhance to do such thing on oral or interview test.From all matters founded in this research, we considere that it will be better to collaborate the both tests at the time. In the other hand, the student may also copy the sentence of the text that related to the question given. It is because on written test, students have more time to read over again the text than in oral test. Written test tends to provide higher score than interview results. After getting the datas we found there is a difference between the results of written test and the test with interview techniques.
So we decided to try using an interview technique. The first step is making the same test format with the form on the JLPT test, but it seems to be ineffective to measure student learning outcomes in the Dokkai subject. This study aims to find appropriate evaluation model to measure reading comprehension. Evaluative method is intended to compare the activities, events, and products with a predetermined standard. This research method is the evaluative research.
From the results of this study are expected to make an effective evaluation model so that we can organize a more accurate evaluation of the Dokkai course. So we feel the need to solve this problem by finding an effective evaluation model to measure students' reading comprehension abilities. But it turns out when we also found that they are still having problems when solving the reading comprehension test in Japanese Language Proficiency Test (JLPT) which is held twice a year. During the teaching-learning process, we have been conducting various kinds of evaluation, including formative and summative tests, and from the results we found that the students could proceed to a higher reading level. Dokkai is a reading comprehension subject at the Department of Japanese Language UNJ, which is conducted from the third semester to the sixth semester.
0 kommentar(er)
